client login
Remember Me
Forgot Password
Local Media Blog [ 912 ]  RSS ATOM

Blog Home

Contact Kelsey

Bookmark this page


previous month  FEBRUARY 2006  next month
s m t w t f s
5 11
12 18
19 21 25

RSS ATOM  Full archive
current month


admin [ 0 ]  RSS ATOM
Carlotta Mast [ 0 ]  RSS ATOM
Charles Laughlin [ 101 ]  RSS ATOM
Greg Sterling [ 748 ]  RSS ATOM
John Kelsey [ 53 ]  RSS ATOM
Matt Booth [ 0 ]  RSS ATOM
Mike Boland [ 83 ]  RSS ATOM
Neal Polachek [ 27 ]  RSS ATOM

Visitors    379170
Online users 112

Feb 22 2006
Printable version  |  Email to a friend
We're No. 2?
If you just read the headline from each of the companies reporting on the new national syndication research results, you could be excused if you thought that a lot of companies are the most used Yellow Pages directories. Some companies are taking the results from a few cities and seem to be implying that they are the national leaders. We are concerned that this is a slippery slope.

Who is No. 1 among cola beverages? If you ask that question in Texas, the answer would be Dr. Pepper. If you exclude fountain sales, Pepsi sells the most nationwide. But overall, Coke is the leader. Frankly, I don't really care. I drink the cola beverage that I prefer.

In the automotive category, General Motors says Chevrolet was the top-selling brand in the U.S. last year, but Ford disagrees. Ford bases its leadership claim on third-party data compiled by auto research firm R.L. Polk. Unlike Coke and Pepsi, which combined have over 90 percent of the cola market share, Ford and Chevrolet face a significant challenger in Toyota, whose brand is closing the gap, particularly when bulk sales of vehicles to fleets aren't counted.

A medium is a different animal than a beverage or a car, but the ability to show your publication as the leader in a particular market, especially on a cost-per-use basis, can be a valuable tool. If syndicated research is here to stay, and The Kelsey Group hopes it will be because it supports our ROI story, we need to have standards that everyone who participates agrees to.

If the Yellow Pages industry wants the credibility that syndicated research gives it, headlines and claims must be reasonable. I am not suggesting that any company has not told the truth in its press releases, but it is most important that the perception by advertisers reflect reality in the particular markets in which they are trying to reach their users. Otherwise, syndicated research won't be taken seriously.
Global Yellow Pages Blog
posted by  John Kelsey at  16:32 | comments [5] | trackbacks [3]


posted by   Neg Norton Feb 22 2006 at 22:49
Nicely said John. I couldn't agree more.

posted by   The Watcher Feb 23 2006 at 17:14
While John makes a valid point with his post, what many people may fail to realize or understand is that up until the release of the first 10 syndicated research studies, there was no proof as to who had what share of the markets.

I remember very distinctly Verizon saying that they had 70% of the Philadelphia market. According to the study, that is not the case. They have less than half.

What the studies do, on top of adding credibility to the Yellow Pages, is add validity to the independent publisher market. Here is the proof that they do exist, and that people do use their directories.

If the independent publishers are sharing the market almost use for use with the incumbent publishers, then the big question it raises in my mind, is why the national channel is so lop-sided when it comes to the total amount of national dollars spent between independent and incumbent?

If we take the studies at face value, from a pure usage standpoint, then the national advertisers are being underserved.

I can make this statement due to the fact that I have spoken to many CMRs in the national space that told me point blank: "We do not do business with the independents."

So who is #1, the advertisers are.

posted by   Ray Feb 24 2006 at 13:55
John, could you recommend a yellow pages provider (that offers an affiliate program) for a website that targest the Los Angeles Metropolitan Area? I'm aware of the affiliate programs offered by and Also, do these two companies have the largest market share in The Southland. Thanks in advance!!!

posted by   Wiseman Mar 2 2006 at 16:16
Could the years of quotas and LEC Publisher comp. plans have held the client's revenue hostage, preventing a CMR from balancing the scales? I think so.

posted by   Larry Angove Mar 2 2006 at 17:10
Right on target. The medium needs to set standards for use of the YPMR data.

(*) indicates required fields
author (*) :
email address :
url :
  bold italic underline add hyperlink add email hyperlink centre unorder list order list add image quote emoticon smiles
comment (*) :

html code

ubb code

max characters : 2000

- +
characters remaining :
remember me :

The Kelsey Group, 600 Executive Drive, Princeton, NJ 08540-1528
Tel: (609) 921-7200 Fax: (609) 921-2112 EMail: [email protected]
Copyright© 2005 The Kelsey Group. All Rights Reserved.